Global Gulag

Supreme Court Protects the State

Global Gulag Introduction
Forbidden History
Reign of Terror
Stuck on Stupid
Totalitarian Collectivism
Radical Reactionary
Inherent Autonomy
Strappado Wrack
View from the Mount
Solitary Purdah
Coup d'état by way of a 'Pseudo Impeachment'
American Amnesia the Liberal Case for Government
Obama Firing of Military Reminiscent of Stalin's Purge
Syria: Another Zionist War for Suckers
The Psychotic Militarization of Law Enforcement
Congressional Resistance against Presidential Despotism
The North Korea Paper Tiger
Defense Cuts and the Global Empire
Preppers, Patriots and Pirates
Bludgeon Constitution Replaced By Fiat Edicts
How to Correct the Course of America
Guns, Guts and Goons
Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
The Duty of the Military in a Militarized Empire
Afghanistan - Failed War from a False Empire
America, Welcome to the Fourth Reich
Jurists Protect the State and Ignore the Constitution
Slaying the New York State Pork Dragon
Central Banks, BIS and Goldman Sachs Coercion
The Cowardly Congress and the Tyrannical President
Political Toadies and a Broken Down System
Hedge Funds Speculators and Their Poverty Premium
Weird Global Warming and Nuclear Science
Hosni Mubarak and American Foreign Policy
The 21st Century Decade Retrospective
Revolution against Central Banks
Road to Serfdom, Yesterday and Today
Genetic Modified Foods and Senate Bill S510
A Banana Republic Ripe for a Coup d'état
Greed is Good, but Derivatives are Better
New World Order vs. America
Globalism - Sun Tzu and The Art of War
The HAARP that only angels should play
This Prison is Built One Person at a Time
Political propaganda is cult brainwashing
The Nature of American Denial
Interdependent Bankruptcy
NASA and the Masada Complex
NATO a Dinosaur Overdue for Extinction
An Indictment of the American Mind
Praetorian Prefect
Immigration Ends the Nation State
The Duty to Dissent
Gravitas best achieved when Embedded
Liberation whether you want it or not
How much fun is this war?
IMF at the core of the thief
Subterfuge that deceives parents
Revisit the Planet of the Apes
Imperium the foe of the NWO
Global Fair Trade
Metropolis Melodrama
FCC advances the Corporate-State
The CFR - NeoCon Connection
Total Recall
Taking tea with the tribes
Continuity of Government Commission
Pipe Dream of Economic Globalism
To Protect and Serve
Globalism Dissension
The Plan - Apartheid Wall
The New Deal built the New World Order
Pharisee Christians
911 + 2
Oil Roustabout Economy
Prince of Darkness is not the problem
Cuba a threat or an opportunity?
A "taikonaut" and spy in the sky
Paranoia is home spun
International Court of Justice
Satan lives in George Soros
George Soros is the Issue
Supreme Court Protects the State
Globalization: Exporting America
What is Conservative Populism?
UPS - Wal-Mart and Inflation
No where to go and no where to hide
All's well with Afghanistan opium trade
NeoCons are a terminal disease
CAFTA: Wall Street vs Main Street
"Neoliberal" Globalisation
Frank Rich vs. Bill O'Reilly
What Is This War About?
Outsourcing - worst of Crony Capitalism
UN transparency and accountability
Pre-emption and Unilateralism
The march into internment advances
The First Bush Presidency
Bilderberg Propaganda Rules the Planet
Different Kinds of Gulags
Jonathan Pollard a "False Flag" Superstar
Israel-First NeoCons = anti-American Turncoats
Treason Is Not Patriotic
The plan is moving along as always
The Extinction of the Middle Class
Is the Economy Viable?
USrael and Armageddon
Hamas, Israel and the United States
Martyring Voltaire
The Real Threat to National Security

When someone behaves like a beast, he says: "After all, one is only human."
But when he is treated like a beast, he says, "After all, one is human."
Karl Kraus


Supreme Court Protects the State

Take all the weapons away from the people
And all the pitch forks will be in the hands of the STATE

The highest court in the land operates with one purpose - Preserving the Protection Racket. The idea that the U.S. Constitution means what it says and that the Bill of Rights has the categorical purpose of safekeeping individual rights, is ignored by the black ropes. Little attention has been given in the media to the refusal of the court to hear and rule on Silveira v. Lockyer, 312 F3d 1052 (9th Cir. 2002) a Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision that the Second Amendment affords Americans no personal right to own firearms. By declining to take up this review, the Supreme Court ruled as every court has with their silence, since 1939.

According to Sue Ann Schiff, “Since [U.S. v.] Miller lower courts have considered Second Amendment challenges in hundreds of cases, not one of which has struck down a gun law on the basis of the Amendment. The Supreme Court has had many opportunities to review these decisions and has consistently refused to do so.”

Are all these courts wrong over the last six decades? ABSOLUTELY!

The issue of individual ownership of firearms is the clearest and most definitive RIGHT of all - preservation of your life by the means of self defense. Plainly, this right rests within each individual. It is NOT a prerogative that resides within the State. Since the government is not a person, its only claim for continuance comes from the consent of the people.

This reality of human existence is not shared by defenders of government. Courts are designed to supersede natural human rights and function as arbitrators for the gatekeepers that maintain the State. There is nothing intrinsic in any court structure that guards the rights of citizens. Quite to the contrary, courts are creatures of the government, and maintain their power through the existence of the State. Contrived rulings are the norm; since the law has become a perversion of language, logic and common sense.

Guns are neutral items, but can become deadly weapons when bullets are fired by human hands. When courts deny the unrestricted lawful possession of legitimate means for personal protection, the courts expose themselves to their real loyalty - despotism. As long as citizens accept this fraud, sanctioned by an artificial judicial procedure, our mutual plight will be relegated to captivity. The law is NOT what judges tell us it is. The law is the essence of the intent and meaning of the moral principles that underpin the social conduct that protects individuals from wicked elements. The foremost lawbreaker is the STATE.

Disagree with this conclusion? Better look closely at the latest Supreme Court case they did take!  A unanimous opinion by Justice David Souter said 15 to 20 seconds before forcible entry was enough to satisfy the Fourth Amendment's ban against unreasonable searches. The lesson should be clear. The police-state can break in and you better not have the weapon that could endanger the SWAT squad.

Still not convinced? How about that other case the top court will hear! The Supreme Court agreed yesterday to consider a Bush administration plea to extend US law enforcement authority around the world -- a significant issue as the government wages a global war on terrorism. "It is precisely when criminals are harbored abroad that diplomatic, foreign policy, and law enforcement concerns overlap and must be balanced, and that the need for decision-making by the Executive Branch becomes paramount," the appeal contended.

Let’s sum up, this is not a hard exercise to understand. The government defines who are criminals. Terrorism is the worst evil on the planet since it threatens the State. Individuals can’t be trusted to have firearms since some may become revolutionaries. Courts have a duty to protect the man who signs their check. And any other country that disagrees might get a visit from the - knock down your door - storm troopers.

This is the pattern of the rule of law in the United States, post 911. Surely, the State can’t allow another Georgia! (while it applies - not the home of the peanut farmer) Can you imagine EIR gets the picture, while the Bush flag wavers keep rooting on the enforcers of the law . . . Eduard Shevardnadze said that he was leaving the building of the State Chancellery without tears. It is inconceivable to think that a bloodless coup could remove our government from their seats of their supremacy! No “fear of tears” for our fearless leaders, the courts will protect them from disgruntled AMERICANS . . .

No guns means no risk of exile. A nice neat program for law and order. Their law and your obeisance. Forget the old Republic, the substitute has too many advantages, so says the judge! As soon as the individual is eliminated from protecting themselves, the courts won’t be needed to rule on cases; civil actions against the federal government, won’t be entertained. All the protection will come from those regents, who will regulate those militias. Yes, the Supreme Court must remain absolute; how else can you have peace and rid the society of criminal elements that endanger the dominion? The magistrate is the law and will determine what is illegal. So say the Supreme Court for the ‘United Interests of the STATE’.

SARTRE - December 4, 2003

It is the invariable habit of bureaucracies, at all times and everywhere, to assume...that every citizen is a criminal. Their one apparent purpose, pursued with a relentless and furious diligence, is to convert the assumption into a fact. They hunt endlessly for proofs, and, when proofs are lacking, for mere suspicions. The moment they become aware of a definite citizen, John Doe, seeking what is his right under the law, they begin searching feverishly for an excuse for withholding it from him.
H.L. Mencken

Join the BREAKING ALL THE RULES Public Forum


Subscribe to Newsletter daily updates

© 2000-2020 by BATR All Rights Reserved

BATR Index Page

statistics for vBulletin