Global Gulag

International Court of Justice

Global Gulag Introduction
Forbidden History
Reign of Terror
Stuck on Stupid
Totalitarian Collectivism
Radical Reactionary
Inherent Autonomy
Strappado Wrack
View from the Mount
Solitary Purdah
Coup d'état by way of a 'Pseudo Impeachment'
American Amnesia the Liberal Case for Government
Obama Firing of Military Reminiscent of Stalin's Purge
Syria: Another Zionist War for Suckers
The Psychotic Militarization of Law Enforcement
Congressional Resistance against Presidential Despotism
The North Korea Paper Tiger
Defense Cuts and the Global Empire
Preppers, Patriots and Pirates
Bludgeon Constitution Replaced By Fiat Edicts
How to Correct the Course of America
Guns, Guts and Goons
Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
The Duty of the Military in a Militarized Empire
Afghanistan - Failed War from a False Empire
America, Welcome to the Fourth Reich
Jurists Protect the State and Ignore the Constitution
Slaying the New York State Pork Dragon
Central Banks, BIS and Goldman Sachs Coercion
The Cowardly Congress and the Tyrannical President
Political Toadies and a Broken Down System
Hedge Funds Speculators and Their Poverty Premium
Weird Global Warming and Nuclear Science
Hosni Mubarak and American Foreign Policy
The 21st Century Decade Retrospective
Revolution against Central Banks
Road to Serfdom, Yesterday and Today
Genetic Modified Foods and Senate Bill S510
A Banana Republic Ripe for a Coup d'état
Greed is Good, but Derivatives are Better
New World Order vs. America
Globalism - Sun Tzu and The Art of War
The HAARP that only angels should play
This Prison is Built One Person at a Time
Political propaganda is cult brainwashing
The Nature of American Denial
Interdependent Bankruptcy
NASA and the Masada Complex
NATO a Dinosaur Overdue for Extinction
An Indictment of the American Mind
Praetorian Prefect
Immigration Ends the Nation State
The Duty to Dissent
Gravitas best achieved when Embedded
Liberation whether you want it or not
How much fun is this war?
IMF at the core of the thief
Subterfuge that deceives parents
Revisit the Planet of the Apes
Imperium the foe of the NWO
Global Fair Trade
Metropolis Melodrama
FCC advances the Corporate-State
The CFR - NeoCon Connection
Total Recall
Taking tea with the tribes
Continuity of Government Commission
Pipe Dream of Economic Globalism
To Protect and Serve
Globalism Dissension
The Plan - Apartheid Wall
The New Deal built the New World Order
Pharisee Christians
911 + 2
Oil Roustabout Economy
Prince of Darkness is not the problem
Cuba a threat or an opportunity?
A "taikonaut" and spy in the sky
Paranoia is home spun
International Court of Justice
Satan lives in George Soros
George Soros is the Issue
Supreme Court Protects the State
Globalization: Exporting America
What is Conservative Populism?
UPS - Wal-Mart and Inflation
No where to go and no where to hide
All's well with Afghanistan opium trade
NeoCons are a terminal disease
CAFTA: Wall Street vs Main Street
"Neoliberal" Globalisation
Frank Rich vs. Bill O'Reilly
What Is This War About?
Outsourcing - worst of Crony Capitalism
UN transparency and accountability
Pre-emption and Unilateralism
The march into internment advances
The First Bush Presidency
Bilderberg Propaganda Rules the Planet
Different Kinds of Gulags
Jonathan Pollard a "False Flag" Superstar
Israel-First NeoCons = anti-American Turncoats
Treason Is Not Patriotic
The plan is moving along as always
The Extinction of the Middle Class
Is the Economy Viable?
USrael and Armageddon
Hamas, Israel and the United States
Martyring Voltaire
The Real Threat to National Security

"I think it is a very backwards step. It is unprecedented which I think to an extent smacks of pettiness in the sense that it is not going to affect in any way the establishment of the international criminal court".
Judge Richard Goldstone


International Court of Justice

World Courts mean lost sovereignty
Countries are not subject to international judges

The central issue in international affairs centers upon a definition on the nature of sovereignty. Nations have long been in retreat to the whims of the world community. Seldom is there a vigorous defense of the independence of individual States. The historic norm of self-government has transformed into acquiescence, and justice is seen as a function of the international will. The idea that freedom resides within the boundaries of a civil state, now conflicts with the larger aspirations of collective governments.

Over a decade ago, in the American Journal of International Law, Thomas M Franck states: “The International Court of Justice's recent decisions in the case concerning interim measures brought by Libya against the United States and the United Kingdom may be the most important and jurisprudentially rich of any handed down by this Court since the end of the Cold War”. He compares this decision to “Marbury v. Madison - the U.S. Supreme Court, while upholding the legality of a disputed act of a political branch of government, gave itself the ultimate power to determine whether the political branch, in any particular instance, has acted constitutionally. The judicial "politics" of Marbury were simple but brilliant.”

No need to go any further in analyzing the particulars in this decision. All that needs to be absorbed is that the underlying premise of judicial supremacy is the root cause of injustice. When this fallacy is extrapolated into the arena of international affairs, it is not difficult to see how judicial arrogance seeks to rule over disputes between conflicting nations. Allowing this supposition to go unchallenged permits the World Court to dictate arbitrary decrees based upon their own political interests.

Consider closely the rudimentary argument of lawyers who defend that the supreme law is the Constitution itself. If that was so, why is it that the ordinary practice of re-inventing the basic canons are the regular functions of judges? When this sanctioned fraud is applied to ruling that arbitrates among competing foreign interests, the result is usually a summary judgment from a court, who is accountable to only the political elites, that benefit from the enforcement of disciplinary rebuke to opposing nations.

The game of power politics on a world wide scale doesn’t have justice as its objective. No, the real task before the tribunal is to punish dissenting countries.

Is it sensible to allow a self proclaimed privileged and protected status for these magistrates? Accountability is at no time raised and negligence is never an issue. Just ponder the attitude expressed in the disclaimer of liability on International Court of Justice site:

1. The International Court of Justice hereby disclaims any liability or responsibility arising from the use of information or data contained at this site.

2. The Court, members of its staff and its contractors shall not be liable for any financial or other consequences whatsoever arising from the use of information or data contained at this site, including the inappropriate, improper or fraudulent use of such information or data.

3. The Court provides to users of ICJ data that information which the Court deems, on the basis of its own criteria and in its sole and complete discretion, to be appropriate for disclosure.

4. Information or data contained at this site may not be reproduced or used for commercial purposes.

5. The consultation or use of ICJ data shall automatically constitute full acceptance of the above disclaimer of liability.

When the United States withdrew from a treaty to establish an International Criminal Court, the outrage from human rights organizations turned up the volume. Only a die hard apologist for successive administrations would exempt the U.S. from past and present wrongs. However, holding our officials answerable for their misdeeds and crimes are the concerns of Americans, not the responsibility of utopian courts!

But what is lost in the mystification of legal gyrations is the key element of distinct and separate jurisdiction, that any country that enjoys the consent of its population, retains as a rationale for its authority. The proponent for global governance are assisting the sinister forces that envision an interdependent oligarchy. The ICJ is a show trial for rogue elements. Since the case to support the world community is suspect, even under the most favorable of characterizations, by what magical faith are we to believe that real justice is possible, let alone likely?

The preference may no longer be an effective option, but the decision is still a valid choice: Do you want a sovereign America or are you willing to relinquish the few remaining civil liberty protections to a world court? If Mr Franck’s view prevails and a reincarnated John Marshall, in international garb, sits in session on a ICJ courtroom - justice will be defined by a foreign lawyer. Self determination cannot exist, when jurisdiction is reserved for and by the elites. The globe has not shrunk and remains distinct and separated by culture and heritage. Only a idiot would forgo a trial by a jury of your peers. You get a preview of the planned judicial system that’s coming for the dissenters. Move over Milosevic, the waiting list for righteousness has gone international.

SARTRE - November 2, 2003

Because of its power and global interests U.S. leaders have committed crimes as a matter of course and structural necessity. A strict application of international law would ... have given every U.S. president of the past 50 years Nuremberg treatment.
Edward Herman, Z magazine

Join the BREAKING ALL THE RULES Public Forum


Subscribe to Newsletter daily updates

© 2000-2020 by BATR All Rights Reserved

BATR Index Page

statistics for vBulletin