Global Gulag

Taking tea with the tribes

Global Gulag Introduction
Forbidden History
Reign of Terror
Stuck on Stupid
Totalitarian Collectivism
Radical Reactionary
Inherent Autonomy
Strappado Wrack
View from the Mount
Solitary Purdah
Coup d'état by way of a 'Pseudo Impeachment'
American Amnesia the Liberal Case for Government
Obama Firing of Military Reminiscent of Stalin's Purge
Syria: Another Zionist War for Suckers
The Psychotic Militarization of Law Enforcement
Congressional Resistance against Presidential Despotism
The North Korea Paper Tiger
Defense Cuts and the Global Empire
Preppers, Patriots and Pirates
Bludgeon Constitution Replaced By Fiat Edicts
How to Correct the Course of America
Guns, Guts and Goons
Vladimir Putin Nemesis of the New World Order
The Duty of the Military in a Militarized Empire
Afghanistan - Failed War from a False Empire
America, Welcome to the Fourth Reich
Jurists Protect the State and Ignore the Constitution
Slaying the New York State Pork Dragon
Central Banks, BIS and Goldman Sachs Coercion
The Cowardly Congress and the Tyrannical President
Political Toadies and a Broken Down System
Hedge Funds Speculators and Their Poverty Premium
Weird Global Warming and Nuclear Science
Hosni Mubarak and American Foreign Policy
The 21st Century Decade Retrospective
Revolution against Central Banks
Road to Serfdom, Yesterday and Today
Genetic Modified Foods and Senate Bill S510
A Banana Republic Ripe for a Coup d'état
Greed is Good, but Derivatives are Better
New World Order vs. America
Globalism - Sun Tzu and The Art of War
The HAARP that only angels should play
This Prison is Built One Person at a Time
Political propaganda is cult brainwashing
The Nature of American Denial
Interdependent Bankruptcy
NASA and the Masada Complex
NATO a Dinosaur Overdue for Extinction
An Indictment of the American Mind
Praetorian Prefect
Immigration Ends the Nation State
The Duty to Dissent
Gravitas best achieved when Embedded
Liberation whether you want it or not
How much fun is this war?
IMF at the core of the thief
Subterfuge that deceives parents
Revisit the Planet of the Apes
Imperium the foe of the NWO
Global Fair Trade
Metropolis Melodrama
FCC advances the Corporate-State
The CFR - NeoCon Connection
Total Recall
Taking tea with the tribes
Continuity of Government Commission
Pipe Dream of Economic Globalism
To Protect and Serve
Globalism Dissension
The Plan - Apartheid Wall
The New Deal built the New World Order
Pharisee Christians
911 + 2
Oil Roustabout Economy
Prince of Darkness is not the problem
Cuba a threat or an opportunity?
A "taikonaut" and spy in the sky
Paranoia is home spun
International Court of Justice
Satan lives in George Soros
George Soros is the Issue
Supreme Court Protects the State
Globalization: Exporting America
What is Conservative Populism?
UPS - Wal-Mart and Inflation
No where to go and no where to hide
All's well with Afghanistan opium trade
NeoCons are a terminal disease
CAFTA: Wall Street vs Main Street
"Neoliberal" Globalisation
Frank Rich vs. Bill O'Reilly
What Is This War About?
Outsourcing - worst of Crony Capitalism
UN transparency and accountability
Pre-emption and Unilateralism
The march into internment advances
The First Bush Presidency
Bilderberg Propaganda Rules the Planet
Different Kinds of Gulags
Jonathan Pollard a "False Flag" Superstar
Israel-First NeoCons = anti-American Turncoats
Treason Is Not Patriotic
The plan is moving along as always
The Extinction of the Middle Class
Is the Economy Viable?
USrael and Armageddon
Hamas, Israel and the United States
Martyring Voltaire
The Real Threat to National Security

The real death of America will come when everyone is alike.
James T. Ellison


Taking tea with the tribes

Same standards for all people
What's next - Tiger Woods gets to ride a cart?

Oh what a tangled web we weave, by allowing a high court to define what is equal. You remember Amendment XIV to that ‘living’ document that expands and contracts as the uppermost jurists sees fit:

“No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Awe, equal protection - what a glorious concept! But exactly what does equal mean in the world of autarchic judiciary? If you didn’t know before, you have your answer now. One almost thinks that Justice Lewis F. Powell still lives: “A diverse college campus population benefits all students and society at large, and colleges may pick their students based in part on race.” Affirmative action meets Bakke at an Omega Psi Phi fraternity social, accompanied with Sandra Day O'Connor as his date . . . Kind of reminiscent of the tune - all we need is love.

Folks just because the Hatfield-McCoy truce has been signed, it doesn’t mean they are kin. So too, the notion that diversity is beneficial doesn’t institute benefits. The Supreme Court repudiated, in the recent decision regarding the undergraduate admission system at Michigan University, that a fixed and automatic assignment of points based upon race is arbitrary. However, it left the door wide open to sanction college administrators to devise fresh methods to set their quotes of social blame. Discrimination is now legal, if you are one in the entourage that believes the Supreme Court is the final voice of the law.

Well, let’s confess the wisdom of this bench, even if it is warped by defective reasoning. The assumption that diversity is a compelling interest, desirable and sacred, is suicidal for any society. It is comical to hear halfwits argue that a civil war was fought to realize that all people are equal. Tribes are bloodlines that have particular social and genetic distinctions. Diversity is defined as the fact or quality of being different. Advocates of affirmative action, often are bands of ethnic groups that endure lives of envy. Caucasian sympathizers for special treatment for any aspiring minority, have little self-respect for their own kind and a doom wish to become hostage to extortion and blackmail. When a race resigned themselves to inherent and cultural inadequacies, they often supplicate for relief from the boss. However, when they act like responsible adults and compete within the marketplace of life, they earn their way to mutual respect.

Now that the Supreme Court acknowledges that discrimination against the dominate European centric culture is not only proper, but advantageous; those descendants should be prepared to become the whipping boy for the shameless guilt in a society of desolation. Even if you are not a fan of Martin Luther King, would his colorless dream resemble a Jessie Jackson rainbow coalition? But why yearn for social justice, that first woman of the top court says approved differences deserve dissimilar consideration. What a noble precedent! Some are more equal than others. Thank the Lord that the concept of “equal protection of the laws” has been struck down from that revolting due process of law amendment. Finally, we can all be honest - tell it like it is - and accept our plight in life.

Not all citizen are equal in this multicultural paradise.

Therefore, it is all about raw power. The game has become - who gets to make the rules so that, the less privileged, are required and compelled to obey. As in the arena of foreign policy, blowback has a domestic component. Discrimination in reverse gear is certainly not righteous retribution. Government can impose their volition, but it can never legislate brotherly love. Courts can pronounce sentences, but can never adjudicate deserved esteem. Any society that is composed of hostile factions will always be at war with itself. The basic reality of political existence is that different peoples have contrasting interests and aspirations. One shape does not fit all. No formula instills harmony, when the policy is intrinsically flawed. The principles of social justice demand equal treatment.

Isn’t that the proper social goal? Being different is the essence of diversity. Rewarding benefits based upon skin color is immoral. But if the dam of honesty has its spillways unlocked and the overflow of candor rushes forth, why not manage the flow before the flood destroys everyone’s community? The primary admission that many refuse to face up or confront is that most groups want to interact primarily among themselves. Assigning an educational degree does little to ensure social compatibility. Trading preferences will never guarantee unanimity. Isn’t the entire point about the purpose for respectful race relations, to allow the other guys to be themselves?  Guess the maximal female judge doesn’t accept that goal. O'Connor acts like a white version of that infamous N word, when she upholds the favoritism of affirmative action.

Racial preferences deserve to be directed within separate societies. This melting pot is a vile Irish ‘Sandra Day Stew, that defiles all who ingest its poison. If the new rules are clear that it’s now legal to recompense inferior performance based upon race, then it is time to wage the war for dominate supremacy. The repercussions for running away from this struggle is subservience. If you are so consumed with the equality of others, over your own; you will surely not miss when your parity is extinct.

Separate may not be equal, but forced integration is frightfully destructive. Add to this equation, the component of automatic preferences, and you get cancerous quotas. Hardly a recipe for sharing high tea and splitting crumpets. When will this society wake up and admit that the grand experiment has failed? Those minorities who enjoy elevated standards of living, earn their way. Explicit altruism, never breeds self reliance, nor does it engender respect from guardian angels. Each ethnic group secured their rise in position through hard work, discipline and talent.

When the Supreme’s recorded “I’m going make you love me”, the lyrics and melody were not the product of a bleeding heart admissions board. If you really want to reach the relationship “Someday We’ll Be Together”, affirmative action must be seen as an insidious insult to every person who values their own dignity. Until this diseased culture repudiates forced and contrived equality, no one will achieve their full potential. The hypocrisy of O'Connor won’t prevent the ‘Love Child’ of all the Diana Ross wanna-a-bees. Only personal effort and responsibility offers lasting hope. Until the day that most Americans accept reality, the rest of us who understand human nature, will reserve our right to discriminate against a governmental system that betrays our eternal principles.

SARTRE - June 25, 2003

Since the 1960s, we have seen the failure of the melting pot ideology. This ideology suggested that different historical, cultural and socioeconomic backgrounds could be subordinated to a larger ideology or social amalgam which is "America." This concept obviously did not work, because paradoxically America encourages a politics of contestation.
Edward Said

Join the BREAKING ALL THE RULES Public Forum


Subscribe to Newsletter daily updates

© 2000-2020 by BATR All Rights Reserved

BATR Index Page

statistics for vBulletin