Cloning the future for same sex marriages!
|Only GOD created the universe and man
|Man must accept and obey his creator
Do you ever sense that it can’t get any worse? Every so often seemingly unrelated events can put the
entire quandary into a distinct perspective. Presently, the combination of Canada’s decision that would change its law
to allow homosexual marriage and the American Medical Association endorsement of cloning for research purposes, hits a new low. Just what kind of society is humanity willing
It is hard to find two examples that are more clear cut and pristine in their immoral disposition. If there
is a need to argue against each practice, those who promote such behavior, have already perverted the culture. This is not
an issue of being broad minded, tolerant or progressive. It is fundamental. Breathing is essential to sustain life, now we
are being refitted to accept conjugal union from opposite ends. The first is necessary, while the later is discretionary.
Elective behavior means it is optional. That plainly means that a moral decision, for good or bad, is part of the decision.
The idea that there exists a visible standard for conduct is the most assaulted concept in the emerging
cesspool that masquerades as living. As civilization expires, the substitute escalates to elevated levels of depravity. How
course it has become in cultured circles to condemn deviancy. Removing the reproductive miracle from human contact would naturally
end the species. But before the inborn demise occurs, the science of cloning multiple Frankenstein surrogates will rescue
the breed, from a self inflicted mass suicide.
“The subtitle to Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is The Modern Prometheus. In one version of the myth, Prometheus defends the human race against Zeus and, as a consequence,
suffers greatly for a long period of time. Prometheus somehow feels responsible for the beings for whom he has defied the
Gods to bring new knowledge and new tools. Looking at Frankenstein as Prometheus the natural comparison is the knowledge of
life from death and the knowledge of Fire. Like Pandora's box, once opened, unleashed or unbound, the creator loses control
of it's creation. Like Frankenstein, the scientists of today must confront the reality of success in an endeavor that may
well unleash knowledge the consequences of which are unknown.”
|Who will you follow?
|You MUST make a choice!
While the uncertainty that would result from cloning is apparent, the known
outcome of same sex marriage is obvious. The social costs of destroying the traditional family could not be more clear. When
Canada’s Prime Minister Jean Chretien states: "There is an evolution of society," he said in the announcement,
the proposed law would allow religions the right to decide what marriages should be sanctified. Opinion polls indicate a slight
majority of Canadians favor legalizing same-sex marriages. So what are we to expect or accept, from our friends and neighbors,
who live under the maple trees?
If you ask the AMA or the gay community they would presumably be eager to
assemble a society where anything goes.
"The same arguments that are used by proponents of genetic engineering and
cloning techniques could have been raised in defense of the experiments of Dr. Frankenstein. Learning the secrets to creating life inevitably provides lessons to extending
and improving life. The problem becomes the ethical or moral considerations of creation. There is a point where the creator
must take responsibility and where the created gains independence." So too, the autonomy that same-sex couples crave, seeks
a social legitimacy that resembles the feigned righteousness that geneticists avow for their experiments.
Just what is being created from an illicit moral coupling? What will be developed
from designer clones?
Those who favor the connubial values of Vermont over conventional mores of
New Hampshire are more likely to endorse the mad scientist that purports to be enlightened. Who thinks the likelihood that
homophiles will be moving north of the border? More probably the exodus south will be the same perverted and abnormal values.
No wonder that Harry Potter’s social relativism is so popular, just look at the ethics of modern society.
The door opening for cloning research will invariably lead to the lament from
a monster of conscious creation. When Frankenstein utters: "I considered the being whom I had cast among mankind and endowed
with the will and power to effect purposes of horror, such as the deed which he had now done, nearly in the light of my own
vampire, my own spirit let loose from the grave, and forced to destroy all that was dear to me", he speaks for all of
The grave that homosexuals populate is a bed full of degeneration. Acceptance
of such behavior with official government blessings, results in the entombment of brotherhood.
A REQUIEM!–and for whom!
For beauty in its bloom?
For valour fall'n?–a broken rose or sword?
A dirge for king or chief,
With pomp of stately grief,
Banner, and torch, and waving plume deplor'd?
The score from Mozart’s Requiem is a funeral march for a sick society.
No geneticist will raise from the dead the loss of moral virtue.
Freedom presupposes improper choices, while Liberty requires responsible behavior.
No society can continue, prosper and even exist; unless it accepts, preserves and protects its moral foundation. Issues of
unnatural acts, becoming approved unions, is a disaster for any nation. Endorsing cloning and calling it medically ethical
is "totally inappropriate . . . when a number of us believe that human beings start with two cells", is
too mild a rebuke from a doctor and AMA member. It is a catastrophe for all of mankind. The fabric of society easily wears
thin, when immorality is recognized and sanctioned. The human race is shattered when man wants to play God. The solution for
both evils is to obey the natural law and act accordingly.
Listening to Mozart’s Eine kleine Nachtmusik is preferable to attending the last rites of civilization and humanity.
SARTRE - June 20, 2003