View Archives BREAKING ALL THE RULES BATR Forum Forbidden History Reign of Terror Stuck on Stupid Totalitarian Collectivism Radical Reactionary Inherent Autonomy Global Gulag Strappado Wrack Solitary Purdah Dueling Twins Varying Verity HOPE Corporatocracy Negotium M A R K E T S

In Search of James Mattoon Scott

View from the Mount

Sober Thought Provoking Essays


"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third,
 it is accepted as self-evident." Arthur Schopenhauer, Philosopher, 1788-1860

In Search of James Mattoon Scott

A General Who's Time Has Come
James Mattoon Scott was no Judas

Now that Veterans’ Day has been celebratedthe election is behind us and the government is secure with a one party administration, we can all sleep in peace. Don’t be confused that this one party is equated with just Republicans. It’s time to look squarely into the eyes of the beast and admit that rule with one voice is the reality.  The course for war is set and King George will lead the crusade. He will send in the troops, execute the plan and give the generals their marching orders. Little has changed over the millenniums. So where is James Mattoon Scott?

Not familiar with the name? You say you never heard of the man? Well some might remember Brutus, but any resemblance to the fictitious general would only be symbolic. As any avid movie buff would tell you, James Mattoon Scott was called a Judas, by no less than the actor who played Spartacus. In Seven Days in May, Kirk Douglas plays the tormented aid Colonel Martin "Jiggs" Casey to General Scott, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs. Burt Lancaster assumes the role of a fictitious character drawn from the persona of General Edwin  A. Walker of Texas. The confrontation between Scott and the U.S President was scripted over a treaty with the Soviets during the cold war. But the underlying theme deals with loyalty and the real nature of Patriotism.

The analogy for today is that our nation risks her future, based upon an ensuing war that is needless, avoidable and rationalized for its justification - upon very questionable grounds. If our entire history is reducible to retribution for 911, then we certainly have a right to ask all the relevant questions, know all the facts and be told the entire truth. If General Scott had the courage to defy a U.S. President, risk charges of treason and organize a coup d’état, do you have the guts to investigate a story Stranger Than Fiction?

The author of this expose refers to "the lemming effect", applied to 911 is this way:

"For lemmings, denial is a basic psychological defense mechanism used to not only shield themselves from unpleasant realities, but also to reassure themselves that they will still fit within the acceptable range of opinion held by their peer group. Lemmings are absolutely terrified at the thought of being labeled as an "extremist" or a "conspiracy theorist". At all costs, their beliefs must always be on the "right" side of the issue and conform within the boundaries of their lemming peers. Lemmings simply cannot bear the burden of responsibility, or the discomfort, which comes with thinking independently. They'll resist any efforts to change their misguided beliefs with all their mental energy . . . "

If you examine this account you may just appreciate General Scott. If facts, evidence and details cause discomfort, at least read the conclusion - than ask have you been given the true story from your own government? It is disingenuous to deny that the U.S. media has withheld and spiked serious news accounts that are commonly available in the world press. Why and who benefits?

James Mattoon Scott's allegiance was to his covenant. The military, takes an oath to "support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America from all enemies, foreign and domestic" But if you read the entire vow it continues: "that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."  What is the duty of the general when the administration and president betrays that constitution? If the American people were duped into a jingoistic fervor, bordering on hysteria; based upon contrived evidence and cover-ups, just who is the traitor?

Read the infamous Wehrmacht Oath of Loyalty to Adolf Hitler, 2 August 1934 - "I swear by God this sacred oath that I shall render unconditional obedience to Adolf Hitler, the Führer of the German Reich, supreme commander of the armed forces, and that I shall at all times be prepared, as a brave soldier, to give my life for this oath."

What is the difference between allegiance to one madman or to a continual series of treasonous presidents? All Führer’s eventually die, but presidents keep on getting selected, as the voters ratify the none choices. General Scott did not offer the excuse I was following orders. He took the first part of his oath seriously - defend the Constitution against the domestic enemies.

Note the obvious omission from the U.S. oath, the American Nation! We are suppose to accept the latest perversion of constitutional law as the standard for our loyalty, even when it’s systemic function is to suppress the righteous authority of our own citizens.

When Americans buy into the mindset of equating your country as the government, they abdicate self worth for their own sovereignty. Our Enemy, the State by Albert Jay Nock applies as much today as when it was written. Will you be a “lemming” or will you resist the fraud that has been fed you? The words of the general frames the predicament that each citizen must ask themselves: "James Mattoon Scott, as you put it, hasn't the slightest interest in his own glorification.  But he does have an abiding concern about the survival of this country." 

Can you trust the STATE and the version of events that they blend into a montage of mind control that defies belief and all reasonable and objective scrutiny? The connection between portraying a fictional ‘out of control’ general as a traitor, with the reality that the powers who rule are the inventors of real treason, should be evidently clear. Efforts are in place to silence such a message. The Council of Europe has adopted a measure that would criminalize Internet (whatever they decide to label) hate speech, including hyperlinks to pages that contain offensive content.

We urge you to research for yourselves the accuracy or shortcomings in - An Independent Investigation of 911 and the War on Terrorism.  Denial has become the national commodity of choice. No wonder we are asking where are you General James Mattoon Scott, when your county needs you the most? The “Jiggs” are all in control and taking orders. They wipe their rectum with the constitution and salute the image of baal. I know what army I would join and the name of the general I would serve under. The question for you: to what regime will you plead your allegiance and what rule deserves your loyalty? It’s time to decide.

SARTRE - November 14, 2002

Write on my gravestone: "Infidel, Traitor."--infidel to every church that compromises with wrong; traitor to every government that oppresses the people. Wendell Phillips

Join the BREAKING ALL THE RULES Public Forum


Subscribe to Newsletter daily updates

Totalitarian Collectivism and Radical Reactionary
Inherent Autonomy, 'Strappado Wrack', Dueling Twins, Global Gulag and Negotium

© 2000-2019 by BATR All Rights Reserved

BATR Index Page

tumblr analytics