“I don’t believe people should
to be able to own guns.”
- Barack Obama (during conversation with economist and author John Lott Jr. at the
University of Chicago Law School in the 1990s)
Will You Surrender Your Firearms?
Are you a person, who repeats the Pledge of Allegiance
at a local town board meeting or sings the National Anthem at a sporting event? Well, such people are likely candidates to
turn over their firearms, when the collection van stops at your door to remove hazardous guns that endanger you, your family
and neighbors. Surely, you file income taxes and pay your financial obligations to the government, what would prevent you
from surrendering your personal lethal weapons, for the betterment of the state and the best interests of your community?
Let’s get real! Any country that demands the capitulation of the right for self-protection does not
deserve a citizen’s loyalty or obedience. Guns, Guts and Goons looks at the proposed UN Treaty to ban guns. "The clock is running
down and the American public needs to suck up the guts and nerve to oppose such a blatant assault on the natural rights of
individuals, and resist repression from an international cabal of globalists", but the implementation of the grand strategy
comes from within the numerous layers of your own government.
Following the broad footsteps of Firearms-Control
Legislation and Policy: Australia, the Obama administration is hell bent on disarming Americans. In a Summary of Select
Firearm Violence Prevention Strategies, The 1997 Australia gun buyback and its associated regulations is
cited, concluding, "The Australia buyback appears to have had no effect on crime otherwise", and eliminates evidence
that stripping gun ownership has any impact on reducing violent crime.
1. It was large, buying back 20% of the firearm stock.
It targeted semi-automatic weapons.
3. It coupled the buyback with a
ban on certain weapons and a nationwide registration and licensing program.
pattern of further restrictions on ammunition, clips and capacity is a back door approach to the data collection policy for
national registration. The ultimate and final implication is total gun confiscation.
When Charles C. W. Cooke writes in the National Review, and references
a video where Obama Praises Australia’s
Gun Confiscation, his words are to the point.
"Let me be clear, as Obama likes to say: You simply cannot praise Australia’s
gun-laws without praising the country’s mass confiscation program. That is Australia’s law. When the Left says
that we should respond to shootings as Australia did, they don’t mean that we should institute background checks on
private sales; they mean that they we should ban and confiscate guns. No amount of wooly words can change this. Again, one
doesn’t bring up countries that have confiscated firearms as a shining example unless one wishes to push the conversation
Back in the jurisdiction of
the Metropolis state of totalitarian collectivist empire builders, New York; the likes of Governor Cuomo and former NYC mayor
Michael Bloomberg and the current el presidente, Bill de Blasio wage their commissar war against natural rights.
Their goal is to enforce coercive governance upon a defenseless populace society, which is at the mercy of the real criminals;
namely, the politicians, banksters, and corporatist criminals. Driving out of business gun manufactures is the eventual result
of the Economics of Gun
Control, while the autocratic elites enjoy the protection of State Police
Troopers and private bodyguard mercenaries.
"The operational economics of gun control legislation has the purpose
of maintaining a state controlled monopoly for firearms. One such example seen in the bill, known as the NY SAFE Act, included is a ban on any semi-automatic rifles or shotguns with "military-style"
features, such as a pistol grip or a folding stock, has the goal of disarming the public. Such draconian methods drive the
trade in guns underground. The black market in arms becomes the defiant mart for the new criminalization of self-protection
The leaked New York State Counter Terrorism
Bulletin would have you believe that "the "far right," repeating the
meme that those within the liberty movement are more dangerous than Al Qaeda." How long will it be before any gun owner
becomes part of this extremist list?
When the chief crook within the Department of Injustice, Obama’s enforcer Eric Holder speaks, We Want to Explore
Gun Tracking Bracelets, he is preparing the population to accept that the Second Amendment
is so arbitrary and conditional to the whims of the governing tyrants, who will oversee that only designated loyal subjects
have the legal ability to personal self-protection.
making them either through finger print identification, the gun talks to a bracelet or something that you might wear, how
guns can be used only by the person who is lawfully in possession of the weapon.
those kinds of things that I think we want to try to explore so that we can make sure that people have the ability to enjoy
their Second Amendment rights, but at the same time decreasing the misuse of weapons that lead to the kinds of things that
we see on a daily basis."
If you are required to have
a chip in a gun to fire, the next step is to place an authorization microchip implant into you body to pull the trigger.
The Second Amendment:
Last Line of Defense Against Tyranny, states, "The right to keep and bear arms is a doomsday provision to
be used as a last resort when all other rights fail. The founders saw firearm ownership as so necessary that they enumerated
this right second in the Bill of Rights, immediately after defining the right to free speech." What is so hard to understand
about this unambiguous declaration of both common sense and natural law?
There is no doubt, where Thomas Paine stood on the Rights of Man. Paine, best remembered as a professional radical and a revolutionary propagandist
without peer, is as relevant today as he was when he wrote his clarion call. Imagine what Professor Barack Obama says about guns and how 18th century would react to this foreign-born
- In 1996, Obama supported a ban on handguns
- In 1998, he supported a ban on the sale
of all semi-automatic guns
- In 2004, he advocated
banning gun sales within five miles of a school or park, which would have shut down nearly all gun stores
Radical Reactionaries are by nature revolutionaries. Nonetheless, revolt against a government
that has lost illegitimacy does not require arm insurrection. The notion that an armed American citizenry will take on a full-fledged
firefight against officials and authorities is a red herring. The purpose of a militant public is to cause doubt in the minds
of the armed forces intended to deploy against their own people. A total stand down of militarized martial law enforcers is
how to win the Second American Revolution.
against the Crown is no different from the rebellion against the substitute replacement that now reigns under admiralty law from the District of Criminals. The Barry Soetoro presidency is just the latest escalation of imperial rule out of an
establishment system that has totally dismissed constitutional restraints.
With The Psychotic Militarization
of Law Enforcement, federal funding of local Gestapo and SWAT teams trains to carry out a gun
confiscation agenda. Numerous examples are cited in the article, Legal Gun Owners Fight
Local Authorities Over Gun Confiscations. Soon the cultural criminalization of gun owners will become a tenant of
the newfound and official Pledge of Allegiance to the Empire.
Even if avoiding that iron fist knock at the door, the incremental erosions
in a society, that defends personal defense, is the most effective munitions used by the authoritarian despots. Slowly and
surely, the false flag operations used to frighten gullible and insecure dupes has the intent of moving the collective psyche
into a permanently induced state of voluntary subjugation. The Daily Caller features the question posed in American COP, Would You Take Away Guns From Law-Abiding Citizens? Within this
response, the sick mentality of the Eric Holder, Fast and Furious, Justice Department administration, meets the twisted minds of the law enforcement
goons who are unable or unwilling to distinguish between Peace Keeping from "just following orders".
"I’ve known anti-gun cops, who seriously said things
like, "They have no right to own a gun, it’s my job to protect them. If they have guns, it’s just a danger
to me!" You might know someone like that too. And certainly, there are politicians out there who think the same way;
and those very politicians often appoint police chiefs. Since sheriffs are elected, they can serve as a bit of a buffer on
Here lies the best barrier for lawful
protection, the locally elected county sheriff. In spite of this, hope, the magnitude of the designed and deliberate assault
on American Patriots, Tea Party and Truth Movements, readies the preparation for intentional and fabricated civil unrest.
Depending on the response of active military and especially the leadership from the relics of a vigilant officer corps, the
fate of the fallen Republic rests. The answer to question, Will You Surrender
Your Firearms, should be an emphatic, NO. The Chicago Gangster - Obama
the Tyrant article, demonstrates why the Obama regime is an existential danger for
all rational and truehearted Americans. Restoring a meaningful future requires resistance against a despotic government. If
citizens acquiesce to unconstitutional rule, having a gun will not defeat the traitors. The will to resist all government
treason is the first step to prevent national oblivion.
SARTRE – June 16, 2014