The fiction which is interdependency has a prolocutor in the
congregation of Moloch. His name is George Soros. No other single person represents the symbol and the substance of Globalism
more than this Hungarian-born descendant of Shylock. He is the embodiment of the Merchant from Venice. His public reputation
as an astute currency speculator is generous, while his skills as a manipulator and procurer of pain and suffering is shrouded
in the footnotes of the financial journals. Claiming to be a philanthropist, his record is literally one of being a patron
for indentured enslavement.
His assault on Sterling caused the British empire to
shutter. The Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad blamed the American billionaire for nearly ruining Malaysia's economy with massive currency speculation.
And Hard-core Russian nationalists decried as "meddling" his funding of progressive newspapers and institutions in post-Soviet
Russia. But his incontrovertible talent does not rest in amassing financial fortunes, it lies in his social agenda.
While it is reported widely that Soros funded groups
support increased government spending, tax increases, opposes the death penalty and President Bush’s judicial nominees;
it has a far more sinister scheme. In report by Neil Hrab - George Soros’ Social Agenda for America - drug legalization, euthanasia, immigration entitlements and feminism are examined. Mr Hrab point out
that in the book Open Society: Reforming Global Capitalism, Soros wrote that he is: "rather leery of self-appointment, self
righteous" international NGO's. From his own site Soros proudly claims that his foundations are dedicated to building and
maintaining the infrastructure and institutions of an open society. They work closely with OSI to develop and implement a range of programs focusing on civil society, education, media, public health,
and human rights as well as social, legal, and economic reform. In recent years, OSI and the Soros foundations network have
spent more than $400 million annually to support projects in these and other focus areas.
Double standards for an advocate of a permissive, yet
regimented globe? If you think he is a friend of humanity, beware of his public attempt to influence his tribe, by insulting
their benefactors. Before the Jewish Funders Network, he recently made these remarks: "There is a resurgence of anti-Semitism in Europe. The policies of the
Bush administration and the Sharon administration contribute to that," Soros said. "It´s not specifically anti-Semitism, but
it does manifest itself in anti-Semitism as well. I´m critical of those policies." The inevitable outcry from the usual suspects,
just illustrates the orchestrated nature of the Soros effort to rationalize his own social agenda, while deflecting criticism
back to his ancestral blood line. Let the Zionist defend their fears, Soros has another George to defeat . . .
Since President George is busy consummating the relationship
with Ariel, Soros must lump both together in order to attack the Bush administration. If it is the life's mission of Soros
to slay the dragon, why is he so bashful? "It would be too immodest for a private person to set himself up against the president,"
he said. "But it is, in fact" – he chuckled – "the Soros Doctrine".
The Scotsman reports: "Mr Soros invited Democratic strategists
to his house in Southampton, including John Podesta, Jeremy Rosner, Bob Boorstin and Carl Pope. They discussed the coming
election. Mr Soros took aside Steve Rosenthal and Ellen Malcolm, the CEO and president of America Coming Together (ACT), who
were proposing to mobilise voters in 17 battleground states. Mr Soros told them he would give them $10 million.
The next morning, his friend Peter Lewis, the chairman of the
Progressive Corp, had pledged $10 million to ACT. Rob Glaser, the founder and CEO of RealNetworks, promised $2 million. Rob
McKay, president of the McKay Family Foundation, gave $1 million and benefactors Lewis and Dorothy Cullman committed $500,000.
Mr Soros also promised up to $3 million to Podesta’s
new think tank, the Centre for American Progress."
One need not be a Bush lackey to recognize that Soros is less
fearful of Dubya and more motivated to enact his vision for the world. The dilemma that real conservatives have is distinguishing
a truthful assessment of Bush and Sharon policies, while recognizing that the alternatives from a radical globalist like Soros
are equally distorted. If Soros is correct when he says a “supremacist ideology” guides the White House, what
would you call the practices of the archfiend of Free Enterprise? The Soros deception would make Shylock proud. However, where
Shylock: Antonio is a good man.
Bassanio: Have you heard any imputation to the contrary?
Shylock: Ho no, no, no, no: my meaning in saying he is
a good man, is to have you understand that he is sufficient. - The
Merchant of Venice [1.3.10-15]
Certainly George Bush has demonstrated his lack of sufficiency.
No substitute is on the horizon, only alternatives from the likes of a Soros.
So when the billionaire financier said: “he, too, bears
some responsibility for the new anti-Semitism, citing last months speech by Malaysia´s outgoing prime minister, Mahathir Mohammad,
who said, "Jews rule the world by proxy"; why should anyone empathize or embrace Soros’ culpability? As is
the normal practice, it’s not about anti-Semitism! Mahathir Mohammad was just stating the truth . . . The Soros duplicity
is marked with the same betrayal as the framing of the eternal political conflict. The financial desolation that Soros leaves
in the wake of his deceitful transactions is the proof. Ignoring this reality does not make it disappear.
Soros wants to drug you so you can’t think, terminate
you when you can no longer pay tribute, force you to intermingle with alien invaders and emasculate you to an unnatural equality.
If that isn’t the plan of the devil, what else would you call it?