|Never and Audit on the Count
David Irving's persecution has been compared to the prosecution of Galileo.
The Rev. Ted Pike offers up a list of other less celebrated fatalities of thought crimes. Pike's prediction is frightening: "The
conviction of David Irving is a chilling wake-up call that hate crimes laws and international enforcement of them are not
going to go away. They are vital to the ADL/B'nai B'rith master plan for eventual triumph over Christian civilization."
Austria may be getting the recent headlines but Germany has the final solution.
It is called by law - Paragraph 130!
Section 130a Instructions for Crimes
(1) Whoever disseminates, publicly
displays, posts, presents, or otherwise makes accessible a writing (Section 11 subsection (3)) which is capable of serving
as instructions for an unlawful act named in Section 126 subsection (1), and is intended by its content to encourage or awaken
the readiness of others to commit such an act, shall be punished with imprisonment for not more than three years or a fine.
1. disseminates, publicly displays, posts, presents, or otherwise makes
accessible a writing (Section 11 subsection (3)) which is capable of serving as instructions for an unlawful act named in
Section 126 subsection (1); or
2. gives instructions for an unlawful act named in Section 126 subsection
(1), publicly or in a meeting, in order to encourage or awaken the readiness of others to commit such an act,
shall be similarly punished.
(3) Section 86 subsection (3), shall apply correspondingly.
"The Jews do not tolerate any questioning of the 'Holocaust,'" Faurisson
told the Mehr News Agency of Iran. "Against the revisionists they use physical violence and judicial repression because, on
the level of historical and scientific argumentation, they have been defeated hands down by the revisionists. We have been
able to expose their lies, one by one. Therefore Jews and Zionists seek refuge in violence and intimidation. They treat revisionists
Bollyn compares Zündel to Luther. But in a direct report from the
Zündel trial, you get the cruel harsh reality of this kosher inquisition. "Vastly simplified, the Zundel Heresy Trial has now become
the vehicle to try to shake off Israeli (and Allied) control of Germany, and hopefully of Europe. Ernst has become the
symbol and political icon of that struggle because he is the best-known Prisoner of Conscience in the Western world and his
name carries weight and prestige with important dissidents who have put the mosaic together and refuse to live by the Lie."
As reported in the "Poodle Media", the significance of such a show trial is ignored with its ensuing cover-up in order to
perpetuate the only account of WWII allowed. Since history is written by the victor - surely there can be no doubt who
actually won that war!
Perverted hate legislation is coming to Amerika and will be written by the
same Pharisee tribe as in Europe. How quickly the lessons in IMPERIUM by Francis Parker Yockey are shredded from consciousness of rational inquiry out of fear from the gulag despots.
The cultural divide is no myth. It is essentially a spiritual war.
The opponents of individual liberty must eliminate Christian heritage and destroy believers in order to achieve their Talmud
heretical rule. If you believe in the Father and in His Son, there can be no rapprochement with the defilers of His
Intimidation and threats will not destroy the truth. Only apathy and
cowardice will guarantee defeat. The basic purpose of your being is at stake as well as the future of our country.
Allowing the law to be subverted to punish truth seekers, where ever the evidence leads is wickedness incarnate. Patrick Henry
understood the real meaning of the American experience. "Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death" applies directly
to the treachery of faceless thugs who manipulate the law to silence the cries of real social justice. Promoting false
guilt under the guise of a phony tolerance is obscene.
Facts of history do not discriminate among sufferers to make any group special.
Was the dread of the Bataan march or the POW that built the Thai-Burma railway any less important or dear? What about the killing fields of the Khmer Rouge or the Siberian internment hell holes? Was the suffering under the hands of Pol Pot or Joseph Stalin any less tragic? The myth that a Jewish
Holocaust (whatever the actual death count) is the single most evil event in all of history is objectively offensive.
Recent threats upon Rense.com contributors illustrates that the grand inquisitors of intimidation seek to export their persecution campaign to America.
The case of Google Video removing two of revisionist Michael A. Hoffman II's three videos from its free video online website. Hoffman received the following e-mail from Google: Google has
been notified that your videos violate our Program Policies. The titles of the videos are listed at the end of this message.
According to our policy, we are removing the following videos: World War Two Revisionist Charles Provan [and] Deborah Lipstadt,
"Amalek" and David Irving. "Google is supposed to be dedicated to providing access to the whole spectrum of human
knowledge and inquiry. But with their self-censorship of the Lipstadt and Provan videos, they demonstrate to the world that
Google is not an information provider but an information gatekeeper, similar to the tired, discredited model perpetuated by
the old media," Hoffman concluded.
Both of these instances illustrate that much more than censorship is the
core issue. The pattern of structured and methodical targeting of voices that dare challenge the superior status of
those who rely upon a hoax of uniqueness is clearly evident. The legal and natural right of Free Speech is not only
threatened with incarceration, but physical harm is indeed implied. At what point will their strappado rack
be used to bring a version of the infamous paragraph 130 to the United States?
In order to understand and internalize the depth of the spiritual foe, that
politically incorrect academic Jimmy Cantrell in his essay - The Most Significant Part of the Talmud - removes the veil from the temple. Roy Schoeman wrote - Salvation is From the Jews: The Role of Judaism in Salvation
History From Abraham to the Second Coming. "Schoeman is an ethnic Jew who passed from Talmudic study to academia to having
religious visions that led him to say to God that he did not care who God is or what religion he would need to join as long
as God is not Christ because he did not want to be a Christian. Jones labels that the Jewish "animus against Christ" that
is "ancestral, visceral and palpable...." Though Schoeman had prayed that God be anything but Christ, he eventually decided
that Jesus is both the Messiah and God, and Schoeman became Catholic."
Cantrell citing from a review by E. Michael Jones in the February 2004 issue
of Culture Wars, makes this observation: Jones's review is primarily a study of what Schoeman does not say directly in
his book: "... what the Jews had become in the centuries since their leaders rejected Christ, not the religion of Moses but
an anti-Christ ideology."
Before condemning such an insight as anti-Semitic, consider Revelation 3:9 (New American Standard Bible) " 'Behold, I will cause those of (A)the synagogue of Satan, who say that they are
Jews and are not, but lie--I will make them (B)come and bow down at your feet, and make them know that (C)I have loved you.
" (additional verses from letter reference)
The malice within the imposition of hate laws is apparent. The objective
is to silence and punish any questioning of contrived and erroneous political agendas that are designed to subjugate Western
Civilization under the yoke of Talmud sacrilege. Yet, this circumstance is not solely a Jewish plot. Not all Jews
worship at the synagogue of Satan. Likewise not all Catholics were ready to burn Luther or cast Galileo into
a dungeon. Christendom isn't monolithic any more than Jewry.
Light from the Torah contrasts with Judaism's wickedness of the politically
motivated Talmudical objectives. This distinction is crucial to understand the underlying reasons why Irving and Zündel
are subjected to a Zionist paragraph 130 kangaroo court. In all likelihood Faurisson may follow under other
trumpeted up charges.
When François-Marie Arouet uttered his famous quote, the Jesuit educated polemicist could not imagine that in his revolutionary Europe he could be sharing
a cell with Irving some two centuries later. Only in a world devised under the most perverse intentions and tortured
legality could such intellectual inquiry be so criminalized.
When Tony 'poodle boy' Blair challenged Iran's Ahmadinejad: "should come and see the evidence of the Holocaust himself in the countries of Europe",
we see the hypocrisy of the enablers of Talmud tyranny. With blistering speed Ahmadinejad, a populist conservative took
up the challenge and was soundly denied access to inspect the physical evidence that venerates the "Holocaust Industry". Top this off with Blair's own duplicity:
"The Labour leader said he saw a "very strong case" for making it illegal to say that Hitler's extermination of six million Jews did not take
place. Opening an exhibition dedicated to Anne Frank, Mr Blair pledged that a Labour government would give "active consideration"
This is the Europe that deserved to be rescued so that Zionists could rule
over the vanquished? That's not the Western Civilization that merits respect and preservation. Voltaire may not
agree with what Irving, Zündel or Faurisson has to say, but he affirmed that he would defend to the death their right to say
it. His Age of Enlightenment has been crucified just like Jesus. Those same hands can't wash away the blood of their deeds without divine redemption.
Before Section 130a Instructions for Crimes becomes the law for our land,
faithful Americans need to take back our country from duel loyalists and traitors that dread the awakening of the heartland
of God fearing citizenry. The America-First tradition is the solution. The lines are clearly drawn, the foes are
unequivocally known. The saints need to act. Martyrdom need not happen.
SARTRE - February 27, 2006