When the Supreme Court Rules Same-Sex Couples Have Right To Marry Nationwide, the perceptiveness and wisdom of Antonin Scalia sums up the dilemma.
“Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million
Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. The opinion in these cases is the furthest
extension in fact—and the furthest extension one can even imagine—of the Court’s claimed power to create
“liberties” that the Constitution and its Amendments neglect to mention. This practice of constitutional revision
by an unelected committee of nine, always accompanied (as it is today) by extravagant praise of liberty, robs the People of
the most important liberty they asserted in the Declaration of Independence and won in the Revolution of 1776: the freedom
to govern themselves,” Scalia wrote.
the game is over. Tactics to work within the system are futile. When a country substitutes immutable principles with capricious
opinion, valid law no long exists. As the popular culture sinks to new lows of immorality and is based upon public attitudes
of non-functional imbeciles, the most corrupt government officials ignore any equitable restraints on their power.
When the law offers no reasonable recourse or relief,
citizens must defy observance of the destructive decisions and adopt the practice of civil disobedience. Learn from the experience
of Know Nothing - The Reality of the American Experience.
it realistic that enacting State Sovereignty laws can succeed, when the obvious response from the Beltway Beast would be to
ignore the attempt to exert lawful means to put a stop to federal tyranny? And what would the Supreme “kangaroo
court” Judiciary rule on such a basic constitutional precept? Are you a modern day know nothing, or do you understand
the unmistakable answer to this question? Most are unable to make such a leap.
If reeling in the central government through the State legislative process seems
a remote prospect, there must be other alternatives. Nullification is another approach that is getting populace support. “When a state ‘nullifies’ a federal law, it is proclaiming
that the law in question is void and inoperative, or ‘non-effective,’ within the boundaries of that state; or,
in other words, not a law as far as that state is concerned”.
For another option, The New Nullification Crisis: GOPers Vow To Defy SCOTUS Over Gay Marriage provides an approach that the mainstream cultural deviants and establishment legal parasites will demonize.
"A ruling by the Supreme
Court is nothing but an opinion if the legislative branch and the executive branch do not enforce it," DeLay said on Newsmax TV’s The Steve Malzberg Show. "Not only that, if the states would just invoke the 10th Amendment and
assert their sovereignty, they can defy a ruling by the Supreme Court. It's in the Constitution. We can tell the court what
cases they can hear."
may affront legal scholars whose main purpose and function is to protect the esquire elites and subdue the common man to second
Nevertheless, the danger
of accepting the myth that any Supreme Court can rip up the 800 years legacy of the Magna Carta, is suicidal.
Paul Craig Roberts writes:
“Monday, June 15,
2015, is the 800th anniversary of Magna Carta. In his book, Magna Carta, J.C. Holt, professor of medieval history, University
of Cambridge, notes that three of the chapters of this ancient document still stand on the English Stature Book and that so
much of what survives of the Great Charter is “concerned with individual liberty,” which “is a reflexion
of the quality of the original act of 1215.”
When the Supreme Court rebukes the individual liberty of Americans to inflict forced compliance of Obamacare, the
court violates the cannon of justice inherent in the originating document that defines limited authority and accountability
Likewise, mandating federal
enforcement of same-sex marriage upon individual States and all citizens is a hideous perversion of “equal rights”.
The Don Boys article, Homosexuals Want Special Rights, Not Equal Rights! - Presents a compelling argument that warns of the slippery slope from this Supreme Court diktat.
“Chief Justice Roberts’ cousin (a
confessed lesbian) says that perversion should be legal because “society is becoming more accepting of the humanity
of same-sex couples and the simple truth that we deserve to be treated with dignity, respect and equality under the law.”
Senator Rob Portman said that he has taken sides with the same-sex crowd because his son is a homosexual. Do I need to lecture
the Chief Justice and the Senator that right and wrong are not decided by society’s ever-changing standards? After all,
some civilizations butchered children while others ate their foes. In other defunct civilizations children were sacrificed
to pagan gods. And I am purposely making the comparison. Homosexuality has always been called, “The unspeakable crime
against nature.” Also against a holy God!
It is incredible that homosexuals, with a straight face, can demand respect and recognition
of their dignity! May I point out that those people do incredibly dangerous, disgusting, and deadly things? And they expect
respect! What chutzpah! Or as the English would say, “What cheek.” Or as an American would say, “What stupidity!”
Populist paleo-conservatives have warned for years
about the specious authority used to inflict a terminal hemorrhage on the body politik. These latest Supreme Court edicts
are a vivid violation of the U.S. Constitution that any reasonable and literal reading will attest.
Face the facts, America has abandoned the rule under law and no juggling of future
Supreme Court justices will rectify the damage already inflicted by treasonous judges. Real Americans are marks for extinction
as the profaned culture unravels into deeper immorality. The police state operates under the cover and color of law, but has
lost any moral authority to earn the loyalty of honorable citizens.
Providing consent to this outlaw and criminal system is the essence of insanity.
SARTRE – June 30, 2015