"The grimmest dictatorship is the dictatorship of
the prevailing orthodoxy" - George Galloway
Hate Laws Intended to Silence Truth
In a relativism culture of social permissiveness,
the non-judgmental attitude, held out as the suitable standard for conduct, has become the politically correct behavior. One
might think that anything goes under this mindset. However, the exact opposite practice and enforcement, under the most rigid
conditions, is championed as necessary for enlighten and tolerant liberalists. The proliferation of demands that hate speech
is the new capital crime, actually is counter iterative in building a civil society. This orthodoxy of the fanatical, proudly
presents this illuminated and required deportment, as obligatory for all citizens.
So what exactly is hate for the neo-Jacobins?
Obviously, whatever the "Society of the Friends of the LIVING Constitution" deems it to be, because under
the color of law, the self-proclaimed pure of heart, are justified to off the heads of anyone who dares speak out in inappropriate
terms. Remember "thinking progress" for the greater good, must be imposed on anyone who dare defies the wisdom of
the gatekeepers for the collective.
Racism has to go, unless practiced by Negros against whites, or is the mere mention
of such a term a slight to African-Americans? Once upon a time cries of anti-Semitism would be heard if Donald Sterling was made a pariah after the NAACP did an about face after awarding him for promoting civil rights. Not in
today’s world, such a distasteful zealot no longer has the protection of his tribe from the scrutiny of the thought
police. The almost total condemnation of his recently private remarks has the entire sports world clambering for his forced
sale of the LA Clippers.
Such broad-minded fans in a league that made homies multimillionaires
and took them out of the hood, must not be dis. No wonder the attraction of not just the NBA, but sports in general, have
serious minded buffs of the Wide World of Sports looking for, "The Thrill of Victory..." in other arenas.
Why not demonstrate that sporting enthusiasm and jock celebrity worship, by starting a grassroots campaign to install America’s
favorite redneck, Phil Robertson and his Duck Dynasty clan, as the new ownership of the team.
Surely, good standing
Democrats should have no problem supporting a bunch of good old boys from the South. Frances Rice writes in the National Black
Republicans Association site that, KKK Terrorist Arm of the
Democratic Party. "This ugly fact about the Democrat Party is detailed in the book,
A Short History of Reconstruction, (Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1990) by Dr. Eric Foner, the renowned
liberal historian who is the DeWitt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University. Dr. Foner in his book explores the
history of the origins of Ku Klux Klan and provides a chilling account of the atrocities committed by Democrats against Republicans,
black and white."
Carole Emberton, an associate professor of history at the University at Buffalo adds:
party lines of the 1860s/1870s are not the party lines of today. Although the names stayed the same, the platforms of the
two parties reversed each other in the mid-20th century, due in large part to white ‘Dixiecrats’ flight out of
the Democratic Party and into the Republican Party after the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. By then, the Democratic
Party had become the party of ‘reform,’ supporting a variety of ‘liberal’ causes, including civil
rights, women’s rights, etc. whereas this had been the banner of the Republican Party in the nineteenth century."
Fast forward to today’s conductor Eric Holder, of selective bigoted racism, when describing "his people", who "seem to get a pass on
hate crime charges when they select whites for their blood sport", one needs to question who the real haters are. David
Risselada provides a valid assessment in the essay, Hate Crimes Legislation
. . . Racial Identity Politics and the Institutional Racism of the Left.
Once upon a time and in a place long ago, the Democratic Party
defended the rights of the individual to associate with individuals of their choosing and speak their minds openly and without
concern of censor. Since the conversion to ecumenical orthodoxy, the authoritarians that gave you the New Deal and the Great
Society have a long record of creating their own hatred of Free Speech. The example of the New York Times vicious attack on Cliven Bundy illustrates another trumped-up incident ripe to exploit.
"The institutional racism that is built in our society is the responsibility of the
left. Throughout history it has been the democrats who have supported segregation and slavery while continuously voting against
civil rights legislation. Today, they attempt to hide their history through racial identity politics, and the creation of
a system where inequality is the new equality. By creating laws based on racial preferences, the left is telling minorities
that they believe they are not as capable as white men and therefore need their programs in order to stand a chance in the
racist United States of America. This does little but reinforce hatred while attempting to justify black on white violence."
The New American, author William F. Jasper makes the point:
"Much of what Mr. Bundy is saying closely parallels what even many black leaders, authors
and intellectuals — such as Prof. Walter Williams, Rev. C.L. Bryant, Rev. Jesse Lee Peterson, Bill Cosby, Alveda King,
Star Parker, and Alan Keyes — have been saying. But Cliven Bundy’s "sin" is that he is an elderly white
man who is unschooled in traversing the minefield of political correctness — and he was careless in failing to make
important distinctions and clarifications. He "sinned" by being born when he was born, and failing to keep up with
the constantly changing terminology for ethnic designations. He still uses the terms "Negro," "colored people,"
and "Mexican," instead of "black/ African American" or "Hispanic/Latino" — but then, race
activists still argue amongst themselves concerning the "proper" ethnic label to apply to their lineage and group
When Senator Ed Markey, D-Mass., introduces legislation called the "Hate Crime Reporting Act
of 2014," it is another partisan concerted attempt to silence voices and views
entirely protected under the First Amendment, by monitoring radio, television and Internet speech. Can one say arbitrary and
capricious, or will Big Brother now prey on any convenient and moving target to label anyone as a hate monger, that does not
conform to the "PC" orthodoxy?
The excellent video from Ben Swann identifies in New "Hate Crime" Bill Will Attempt To Control
Speech On Internet, Radio and TV, that the real objective is to censor the internet.
Well, this development should concern any student of inquiry,
but the real world often fosters political threats that seem to be so implausible, if they were not true. The case of the
arrest of Paul Weston should alarm everyone. In the Michael Coren interview
or Mr. Weston, the vanguard of British lunacy once again blazes new trails in the annals
of hate speech. If quoting Winston Churchill is now a crime, what does that make Winnie?
The British Bulldog is his own words:
Move over denial ridden Americans; the English
have a talent in leading the civilized world in false guilt. For the rest of humankind, they are perceptive enough to admit
that the normal human condition acknowledges Discrimination as a Virtue.
dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a
man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident
habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers
of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity
and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property — either
as a child, a wife, or a concubine — must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased
to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence
of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.
Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa,
raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the
science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient
has been characterized as racism. Quite to the contrary, discrimination is an ally in the struggle to end bigotry and injustice.
When Liberty is suppressed in a quest for equality; hatred and revulsion breeds, for different groups, cultures and ideologies.
All attempts to force equal treatment are futile, even when severe penalties are imposed."
Condemning a person, solely by his beliefs, bias and predisposition – that fanatical
frenzy will surely bring about the fall of our cherished tradition of Free Speech. For those who fear Sharia Law, you had
better be more concerned about the progressive despots, who are the model for imposed intolerance through a government, which
hates everyone that refuses their Groupthink.
SARTRE – May 5, 2014