Where Are the Coward Democrats? by Victor Thorn
With the release of BYU physics professor Steven E. Jones 30-page
report on the controlled demolition of the WTC towers over three weeks ago, one deafening question keeps pounding through
my mind: why aren’t the Democrats-liberals-progressives taking this information and screaming it from the mountain tops?
30 nov 05 @ 3:09 pm est
Hollywood, Iraq and 9/11: Reinforcing the Party Line by Paul Joseph Watson
Moviegoers in the upcoming months will be bombarded by films
about the Iraq war and 9/11. These movies will uniformly reinforce the official party line that 9/11 was carried out by 19
Arabs with box cutters and that the invasion of Iraq was a heroic act of liberation in the defense of America.
28 nov 05 @ 10:37 am est
Transcript: Alex Jones Interviews Dr. Steven E. Jones
Alex speaks with the suddenly controversial Brigham Young University
Physics Professor about his recent realization that the WTC towers were destroyed by bombs and not planes on September 11th.
27 nov 05 @ 12:12 pm est
Professor Jones Teaches Tucker About 911 by Jon Carlson
On Monday, 11/14/05, Tucker Carlson welcomed Brigham Young
University Professor Steven Jones to the 'Situation.' Steven Jones, a professor of physics, believes that the hijackers may
not have brought down the towers by themselves (Actually he said Moslems didn't do the WTC demolitions).
26 nov 05 @ 7:44 pm est
More challenges to 9/11 circulating myths
A recent article published on The Sydney Morning Herald, reiterated
the theory suggesting that the twin towers did not fall because they were hit by the plane, but because an electronic demolition
made them collapse.
An advertisement, the brainchild of Jimmy Walter, who believes
that the U.S. Government was involved in a conspiracy, shows puffs of explosives coming out the sides of the buildings as
they topple. The ad, which ends with a voice saying: "Reopen the investigation and address the unanswered questions of 9/11",
has been airing in New York for over the past few month.
25 nov 05 @ 6:39 am est
Able Danger: Uncovering the 9/11 Cover-up by Barbara Anderson
Able Danger was not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report.
Weldon has claimed, "There's a cover-up here. It's clear and unequivocal". Freeh makes a good case for an investigation, saying
"The Joint Intelligence Committees should reconvene and, in addition to Able Danger team members, we should have the 9/11
commissioners appear as witnesses so the families can hear their explanation why this doesn't matter." Many other Americans
would like to hear that explanation, also.
24 nov 05 @ 1:30 pm est
Walter Offers $1 Million To Prove WTC Explosions
http://rense.com/general68/atc.htm
The ads and website are the brainchild of Jimmy Walter, who
is convinced the US Government was involved in a conspiracy.
He is offering $US1 million ($1.36 million) to anyone who can
prove that explosives were not used in the World Trade Centre.
Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore "Able Danger"? by LOUIS FREEH
It was interesting to hear from the 9/11 Commission again on
Tuesday. This self-perpetuating and privately funded group of lobbyists and lawyers has recently opined on hurricanes, nuclear
weapons, the Baltimore Harbor Tunnel and even the New York subway system. Now it offers yet another "report card" on the progress
of the FBI and CIA in the war against terrorism, along with its "back-seat" take and some further unsolicited narrative about
how things ought to be on the "front lines."
20 nov 05 @ 9:31 pm est
Louis Freeh Charges 9/11 Commission Cover-Up
Former FBI Director Louis J. Freeh slammed the 9/11 Commission
Thursday saying it ignored – or "summarily rejected" – the most critical piece of intelligence that could have prevented the
horrific attacks of September 11, 2001.
18 nov 05 @ 6:27 am est
911 Flights 'Strangely Silent' About Irregularities & Inconsistencies Of Official Government Story by Greg Szymanski
Except for Ellen Mariani, whose husband was reported on Flight
175, others who lost relatives on the airplanes have kept quiet in stark contrast to those who lost loved ones at Ground Zero.
But when those from the 'airplane community' talk like Linda Gay and Frank Calley, who respectively had family members on
Flight 11 and 77, they accept the government 9/11 story hook, line and sinker.
18 nov 05 @ 6:25 am est
Thermite and the WTC Collapses
Following the WTC collapses thermal hot spots with temperatures
in excess of 700°C existed deep within the wreckage of the buildings. These temperatures were sustained for many days.
17 nov 05 @ 5:13 am est
9/11 and Internet credibility by Mary Maxwell, Ph.D.
How long must we wait to judge the validity of the September
11th conspiracy theories that have floated around on the Internet for years? I believe there is a way to grant status and
authority to the many excellent reports and analyses whose only sin is that they appear in electronic form instead of newsprint.
Moreover, we should start this process right away. After all, if our government is behaving maliciously, we need to know it,
communicate it to others, and act on it with urgency. This will require that we make judgments about September 11th now and
not wait for ‘perfect proof.’
17 nov 05 @ 4:36 am est
911 Demo: BYU's Prof Jones Has Wide Academic Support by Greg Szymanski
BYU Professor Has Plenty of Company in the Academic Community,
Including
60 Faculty Members from Two Utah Universities
Who Concur a Controlled Demolition Most Likely Brought
Down the WTC and
Further Investigation Is Needed
15 nov 05 @ 6:50 pm est
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? - Steven E. Jones
In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of
the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned
explosives. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus damage alone caused complete
collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested
by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.
Read the report in full.
15 nov 05 @ 5:39 pm est
Tracking the 19 Hijackers What are they up to now? At least 9 of them survived 9/11
The FBI still says these are the terrorists.14 But when they
are found alive, the FBI says their identity was stolen, and its not the terrorist.15
15 nov 05 @ 5:25 am est
911 Dutch Treat? by Stephen M. St. John
Those who have bothered to read the 9/11 skeptics know about
the extraordinary "coincidences" that took place that fateful morning. One of them happens to be the lack of routine video
surveillance tapes of ANY of the passengers alleged to have boarded the ill-fated flights at Boston's Logan, Newark's Liberty
and Washington's Dulles international airports.
15 nov 05 @ 5:22 am est
9-11: The Biggest Lie EVER! by Victor Thorn
In a recent 30-page report, BYU physics professor Steven E.
Jones arrived at a conclusion which, although certainly not new, would produce a paradigm shift in thinking so monumental
that it would rock the world to its very core. Yes, Professor Jones is now confirming and reiterating what many of us in the
alternative media have been saying for 4+ years: that the attacks of 9-11 on the WTC towers were actually a controlled demolition,
and that they weren’t carried out by 19 Arab hijackers.
14 nov 05 @ 12:27 pm est
More Miraculous Or Evidence Uncovered Perhaps Planted 9/11 by Greg Szymanski
The ATM card of Waleed Iskandar was returned to his parents,
allegedly found by the Ground Zero Recovery Team on Sept. 11, 2002. Questions remain as to why it turned up a year later and
how could such a flimsy card survive such a towering inferno?
14 nov 05 @ 9:00 am est
Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse? by Steven E. Jones
In writing this paper, I call for a serious investigation of
the hypothesis that WTC 7 and the Twin Towers were brought down, not just by damage and fires, but through the use of pre-positioned
explosives. I consider the official FEMA, NIST, and 9-11 Commission reports that fires plus damage alone caused complete
collapses of all three buildings. And I present evidence for the explosive-demolition hypothesis, which is suggested
by the available data, testable and falsifiable, and yet has not been analyzed in any of the reports funded by the US government.
13 nov 05 @ 11:12 am est
BYU professor thinks bombs, not planes, toppled WTC by Elaine Jarvik
In a paper posted online Tuesday and accepted for peer-reviewed
publication next year, Jones adds his voice to those of previous skeptics, including the authors of the Web site www.wtc7.net, whose research Jones quotes. Jones' article can be found at www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html.
11 nov 05 @ 6:11 am est
Flt 93 And Flt 175 Landed At Or Near Cleveland On 911 -- Says Former Cleveland Mayor by Greg Szymanski
On the morning of 9/11 a little known Cincinnati television
station ran a story saying Flight 93 landed at Cleveland International Airport instead of crashing into the Pentagon as claimed
in the official government story.
Reporters at WCPO Channel 9 quoted then Cleveland Mayor Michael
R. White as saying "a Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing due to a bomb threat," the airplane landing safely,
moved to a secure location and evacuated.
11 nov 05 @ 6:00 am est
Another 911 'Passport Miracle' ! by Greg Szymanski
Calling worldwide attention to the U.S. government lies surrounding
the Pentagon crash, the book l'Effroyable Imposture (The Horrifying Fraud) was published in France. The book makes a strong
argument that Flight 77 did not crash into the Pentagon on 9/11.
10 nov 05 @ 6:14 am est
More Proof 911 Inside Job - Witnesses To WTC Explosives
The 9/11 Commission Report did not even once mention the word
"explosion" or "bomb". The mainstream media hasn't touched the evidence of bombs in the trade center. Democratic and republican
politicans smear anyone who even raises the issue as a conspiracy nut. Isn't it time that we faced the elephant in the living
room? Can our democracy survive if we don't?
10 nov 05 @ 6:12 am est
Daryl Bradford Smith interviews Eric Hufschmid
Author of important 9-11 book speaks out on the Israeli
connections to the 9-11 disaster.
8 nov 05 @ 3:02 pm est
911 Proof
This site is wholly non-partisan, and not intended to criticize
or to bolster any political party. The sources cited come from across the political spectrum. The issues raised transcend
political differences, and are vital to conservatives, liberals and moderates; they affect your life whether you are a republican,
democratic, independent, or non-voter.
This website provides links to credible sources, so that
you can easily check the information for yourself. Just read and click. And then make up your own mind.
7 nov 05 @ 8:32 am est
How did the twin towers fall? Questions remain by PAUL CONANT
NIST's draft 9/11 reports show:
Fireproofing scenario is puzzling
Theory supported by scant
evidence
'Mystery blasts' glossed over
Inquiry considered a 'small bomb'
WTC7 collapse baffles probers
3 nov 05 @ 2:22 pm est
