9/11 Truth Expose
28 jun 05 @ 7:01 am edt
Alex is joined by three different
guests for a two and a half hour 9/11 truth expose. Greg Szymanski and William Rodriguez discuss the controlled demolition
of the twin towers. Rodriguez was a material witness to bombs going off in the basement of the north tower and his story has
been blacked out by the mainstream media.
Also included is former Assistant
Secretary of the Treasury under President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, who recently went public with his doubts about the official
Nine Eleven Down the Memory Hole by Kurt Nimmo
27 jun 05 @ 7:28 am edt
“To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events
of that day goes beyond the pale,” and the “pale,” of course, is defined by Bush and the corporate media, both confirmed liars
and lie disseminators. In order to paint Reynolds with the wide brush of conspiracy kookism, Marrs went a step further.
Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job
27 jun 05 @ 7:10 am edt
Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle
on the British government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out political assassinations, has gone on the record with his
conviction that 9/11 was an inside job meant to bring about a permanent state of emergency in America and pave the way for
the invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria.
The 'Truss Theory': A Fantasy Concocted to Conceal a Demolition
26 jun 05 @ 2:39 pm edt
The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash
into it, that was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building could probably sustain multiple impacts of jet
liners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door - this intense grid - and the plane is just
a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."
WTC Basement Blast And Injured Burn Victim Blows 'Official 9/11 Story' Sky High; Eye Witness Testimony Is Conclusive That
North Tower Collapsed From Controlled Demolition by Greg Szymanski
25 jun 05 @ 7:39 am edt
WTC janitor pulls burn victim to safety after basement explosion
rocks north tower seconds before jetliner hit top floors. Also, two other men trapped and drowning in a basement elevator
shaft, were also pulled to safety from underground explosion..
Jim Hoffman - Booby Trap For 9/11 Truth Seekers by Joe Quinn
24 jun 05 @ 6:08 am edt
It is truly interesting that since our Pentagon Strike video
was released in September 2004, several high profile 9/11 researchers have mounted a campaign to convince their "comrades"
that we should all reject the "no Boeing at the Pentagon" argument. We have already commented on people such as Mike Ruppert
and Daniel Hopsicker who form the backbone of this movement, despite their infighting. Now Hoffman has joined their ranks.
Who will be next, we wonder? The entire operation stinks of "damage control", and damage control is only conducted because
damage has been done.
Building 7 "Pull It" Comment: Silverstein Responds
22 jun 05 @ 6:38 am edt
Whatever Silverstein meant by the term "pull it," the fact
remains that the building collapsed exactly like a controlled demolition and it wasn’t even hit by a plane. It was 'pulled'
in the true sense of the term, by well placed explosives.
So the fact that Silverstein hasn’t made the effort to make
this justification in the wider media, and was only willing to comment on it when pushed, tells us that he’s not comfortable
in being questioned on this, in the face of what now must be hundreds of people calling his office asking about it.
Dirty Little 9/11 Secrets Exposed by Jon Carlson
18 jun 05 @ 5:08 pm edt
Here is another dirty little secret: David Griffin points out
that DOT Secretary Norman Mineta, in his own testimony before the 911 Commission, arrived at the Presidential Emergency Operation
Center in the White House at 9:20 and Cheney and others had been there for some time. The WTC crashes were at 8:45
and 9:02 and the Pentagon aircraft crash at 9:40. David Griffin points out that the 9/11 Commission ignores that evidence
(that Cheney was in the PEOC bright and early) and says Cheney didn't get there until almost 10 a.m. In fact, the story
is the Secret Service dragged Chaney to the Operation Center.
New Mexico Tech Explosives Expert 'Flip-Flops' On WTC Controlled Demo Theory; Refuses To Explain Why by Greg Szymanski
17 jun 05 @ 6:36 am edt
In November 2004, Dr. Romero refused to comment on his "flip-flop,"
acknowledging through his secretary he had nothing to say about the 9/11 controversy. Again this week he refused to talk about
the controversial issue as to whether jet fuel or a controlled demolition brought down the WTC.
Dr. Romero’s "flip-flop" and his refusal to discuss why adds
more fuel to the burning WTC ‘collapse controversy’ since recently a well-respected former economist in the first Bush administration
brought the issue to light when he went public with a detailed analysis.
Former Bush Cabinet Member Appears On Alex Jones Show; Says Government Complicit In 9/11
16 jun 05 @ 9:06 am edt
Former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President
George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds has made waves in the past few days after writing a detailed article stating tha
the official explanation for the collapse of the twin towers and Building 7 was bogus.
FBI worked hard to cover up a 9-11 cover-up—and then hide it some more by James Ridgeway
16 jun 05 @ 8:34 am edt
The FBI actually took steps to hide this man so Congress could
not find him. All this is described at some length in former senator Bob Graham's book Intelligence Matters—the one book on
this entire affair written by an actual participant in the behind-the-scenes wheeling and dealing over what was permitted
to come into public view about 9-11. Graham was chairman of the joint congressional investigation.
Coast-to-Coast AM 9-11 Roundtable (part two) by Victor Thorn
15 jun 05 @ 1:24 pm edt
Let me repeat this point: Griffin and Jones need to hammer
home without mercy the crux, central core issue of 9-11, and that’s the controlled demolition of WTC 1, WTC 2, and WTC 7.
Every other issue is peripheral (secondary), and can be manipulated to promote the government’s incompetence and negligence
9/11: Ten Smoking Guns
15 jun 05 @ 7:13 am edt
Former Bush Team Member Says WTC Collapse Likely A Controlled Demolition And 'Inside Job' by Greg Szymanski
14 jun 05 @ 7:38 am edt
A former chief economist in the Labor Department during President
Bush's first term now believes the official story about the collapse of the WTC is 'bogus,' saying it is more likely that
a controlled demolition destroyed the Twin Towers and adjacent Building No. 7.
Two Years Before 9/11,Bush was Already Talking Privately About Attacking Iraq
10 jun 05 @ 11:22 am edt
According to Herskowitz, George W. Bush's beliefs on Iraq
were based in part on a notion dating back to the Reagan White House - ascribed in part to now-vice president Dick Cheney,
Chairman of the House Republican Policy Committee under Reagan. "Start a small war. Pick a country where there is justification
you can jump on, go ahead and invade."
CIA didn't tell FBI about 9/11 hijackers by Jerry Seper
10 jun 05 @ 4:54 am edt
The unclassified but redacted report also said the "limited
information" that was given by the CIA to the FBI never was documented by the bureau or placed in any system from which it
could be retrieved by agents investigating terrorist threats. It said FBI supervisors lacked adequate oversight of agents
assigned to work with the CIA and failed to give counterterrorism investigations priority.
Report Shows FBI's Missed Sept. 11 Chances by PETE YOST
10 jun 05 @ 4:30 am edt
A sobering inside look at pre-Sept. 11 intelligence operations
by the Justice Department's inspector general chronicles -- in some instances in hour-to-hour detail -- how the FBI missed
at least five opportunities to uncover vital information that might have led agents to the hijackers.
Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? by Morgan Reynolds
9 jun 05 @ 6:57 pm edt
If we put the murder of 2,749 innocent victims momentarily
aside, the only unusual technical feature of the collapses of the twin towers was that the explosions began at the top, immediately
followed by explosions from below. WTC-7, by contrast, was entirely conventional, imploding from bottom up.
It is hard to exaggerate the importance of a scientific
debate over the cause(s) of the collapse of the twin towers and building 7. If the official wisdom on the collapses is wrong,
as I believe it is, then policy based on such erroneous engineering analysis is not likely prove to be sound.
Agents Provocateur? by John Kaminski
8 jun 05 @ 5:46 am edt
It is perhaps a legitimate exercise to point out those who
are deliberately trying to impede or distort a gathering of the facts. But identifying this activity must be weighed against
the higher goal of inspiring a majority of Americans to recognize the capital crimes of their leaders.
Reply to Scientific American's Attempted Debunking of 9/11 Skeptics by Peter Meyer
3 jun 05 @ 4:50 pm edt
Although the author writes under the heading of "Skeptic" he is
not all all disposed to question the official story of 9/11. A skeptic is one who is disinclined to believe when there is
not good supporting evidence. Since there is no good evidence supporting the official story of 9/11 it behooves any skeptic
to question it. The author of this article in Scientific American, who writes under the heading of "Skeptic", thus shows that
he is not at all a skeptic, but rather just another mouthpiece for the official story of 9/11.